King & Spalding (a very prestigious international law firm that has repeatedly represented US domestic industries in anti-dumping/anti-subsidy investigations against Chinese products in the United States) has drafted an anti-dumping and anti-subsidy investigation requesting Chinese-made solar panel products. application. The draft application has been submitted to the US Department of Commerce and the US International Trade Commission for review and comment by two competent investigative agencies. This shows that anti-dumping and countervailing investigations on Chinese solar panel products will soon be initiated in the United States.
In August 2011, three PV companies in the United States successively declared bankruptcy: Solyndra, California; Evergreen Solar, Massachusetts; and SpectraWatt, New York. At the same time, China's photovoltaic industry accounts for about three-fifths of the world's production capacity, and the prices of its products are still falling rapidly.
China's state-owned banks offer very low interest rates. Local governments don't offer zero land prices or ultra-low land prices from provincial governments. Plus, the large scale and low prices of China's photovoltaic industry all make China an international photovoltaic market. The main, highly competitive producer.
The photovoltaic industry in the United States obviously feels tremendous pressure from China. China's photovoltaic companies have far more than just have a cheap labor force, and various factors have enabled them to make their products cheaper.
On September 5, 2011, the World Trade Organization WTO issued a ruling on the Sino-U.S. tire trade dispute case in Geneva, and determined that the United States imposed punitive tariffs on Chinese tires imported into the United States in line with WTO rules. The incident was traced back to the 2009 US Steel Workers’ Union’s indictment to the US International Trade Commission, which sued China for tire dumping of the US market in previous years, resulting in the closure of U.S.-related industries and unemployment of workers. It is also the organization of the American Iron and Steel Workers’ Federation that initiated the 301 case against China's new energy industry last year, which caused a great uproar in our country. Although the 301 case finally focused on the wind energy industry in China, the solar photovoltaic industry has avoided the robbery. However, many of the Chinese PV industry support policies that were challenged by the 301 investigation case, especially policy support for new energy companies rather than new energy users, are Still contemplating.
It is reported that for the anti-dumping and countervailing investigation of Chinese solar panel products that may be initiated by the United States, the Ministry of Commerce had already held a meeting attended by representatives of China's photovoltaic industry on September 14. How to do a good job of industrial self-protection, early warning, and response in the international trade rules is worth our careful consideration. The development of this incident also needs our continuous attention.
In August 2011, three PV companies in the United States successively declared bankruptcy: Solyndra, California; Evergreen Solar, Massachusetts; and SpectraWatt, New York. At the same time, China's photovoltaic industry accounts for about three-fifths of the world's production capacity, and the prices of its products are still falling rapidly.
China's state-owned banks offer very low interest rates. Local governments don't offer zero land prices or ultra-low land prices from provincial governments. Plus, the large scale and low prices of China's photovoltaic industry all make China an international photovoltaic market. The main, highly competitive producer.
The photovoltaic industry in the United States obviously feels tremendous pressure from China. China's photovoltaic companies have far more than just have a cheap labor force, and various factors have enabled them to make their products cheaper.
On September 5, 2011, the World Trade Organization WTO issued a ruling on the Sino-U.S. tire trade dispute case in Geneva, and determined that the United States imposed punitive tariffs on Chinese tires imported into the United States in line with WTO rules. The incident was traced back to the 2009 US Steel Workers’ Union’s indictment to the US International Trade Commission, which sued China for tire dumping of the US market in previous years, resulting in the closure of U.S.-related industries and unemployment of workers. It is also the organization of the American Iron and Steel Workers’ Federation that initiated the 301 case against China's new energy industry last year, which caused a great uproar in our country. Although the 301 case finally focused on the wind energy industry in China, the solar photovoltaic industry has avoided the robbery. However, many of the Chinese PV industry support policies that were challenged by the 301 investigation case, especially policy support for new energy companies rather than new energy users, are Still contemplating.
It is reported that for the anti-dumping and countervailing investigation of Chinese solar panel products that may be initiated by the United States, the Ministry of Commerce had already held a meeting attended by representatives of China's photovoltaic industry on September 14. How to do a good job of industrial self-protection, early warning, and response in the international trade rules is worth our careful consideration. The development of this incident also needs our continuous attention.
Wpc Inner Door,Wood Door,Interior Doors
Fenghua Jade Motor Co., Ltd. , http://www.china-interior-door.com