A few days ago, the United States said it had submitted a formal lawsuit against the WTO subsidy policy for China's auto and auto parts products, saying that China provided at least $1 billion in illegal subsidies to auto exporters between 2009 and 2011. He also said that China is trying to increase exports of automobiles and their components, and has directly targeted the US auto industry worth $350 billion, while the US auto industry is in the process of getting rid of a severe recession and achieving recovery. Soon, the Chinese side made a strong counterattack, indicating that this was a political move for the election. Regardless of the ruling made by the WTO, China's auto industry needs to face the crisis and achieve counter-attacks. Bai Ming: The tire warranty issued by the United States expires. I will resume a high level of tire exports to the United States. The need to take measures to restrict the United States from filing a complaint with the WTO is China’s “export base†project, that is, China supports selected regions. Manufacturers of the automobile industry are trying to build these areas into export centers for automotive products. US Trade Representative Kirk pointed out that this project has helped China's exports of automobiles and their components increase from 7.4 billion US dollars in 2001 to 109.1 billion in 2011. The US trade representative said: "The Chinese project seems to provide export subsidies prohibited by the WTO rules. They are banned because they seriously distort the trade. These subsidies are located in China's automobile manufacturers and component manufacturers. Producers in the United States and other countries have brought an unfair advantage in competition.†The data show that the lawsuit is the eighth lawsuit filed by the Obama administration against China and the third time this year. The latest US lawsuit coincides with Obama’s bidding for the industrial-centered Midwest region, so the US move is considered to have deep political implications. Bai Ming, a researcher at the Research Institute of the Ministry of Commerce, said that the US move was mainly due to the political reasons for the election. At the same time, China's rapid development and broad space in the automobile industry also made the US domestic industry feel threatened and wanted to suppress the competition of Chinese industry. Automotive analyst Zhang Zhiyong said that there are three main reasons why the United States wants to sue the Chinese auto and parts industry again. First of all, for the sake of commercial interests, although the export of Chinese autos does not threaten the United States, the export of spare parts does have a certain impact on the United States. Because of the high cost performance of Chinese auto parts, it may replace the US parts industry. The part with low technical content. What's more, the Obama administration needs to compete for the US election. In addition, the tire special insurance implemented by the United States in 2009 has expired, and China’s tire exports to the United States may have recovered to a relatively high level, so measures need to be taken to restrict China’s exports. Mei Xinyu: China's auto parts exported to the United States is a useful supplement to its industry. The Chinese auto industry is indeed a threat. According to the data, in 2001, the total number of vehicles and chassis exported by China was only 22,776, with an export value of US$ 208.11 million and exports of auto parts and components of US$ 13.53 billion. By 2011, China’s total vehicle exports had reached 820,000 units. 9,938.16 million US dollars, exports of auto parts and components 22.9762 billion US dollars, an increase of 23.2% over the previous year. In the first seven months of this year, China's automobile exports totaled 540,000 vehicles, an increase of 19.4% year-on-year. The export value was US$7.1027 billion, an increase of 38.7% year-on-year. The export of auto parts was US$1.442934 billion, a year-on-year increase of 15.3%. Mei Xinyu, a researcher at the Ministry of Commerce, said that the US auto industry is not booming. But Obama’s choice to provide 12.4% of Ohio’s employment in the automotive industry is not necessarily effective. The US accusation against China may not be able to stand firm. Even if it stands in a more responsible and long-term view of the interests of the United States, it is dangerous to abuse the countervailing lawsuits against China. Because the United States and the Obama administration themselves use a variety of subsidies for the development of specific industries. After the subprime mortgage crisis escalated, in the process of pushing for “re-industrialization†and marketing “selecting the United States†to overseas investors, from the federal to state and local governments, the scope and intensity of various fiscal and tax incentives in the United States. They are expanding. Zhao Ying, a researcher at the Institute of Industrial Economics of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, believes that although China's export of auto parts to the United States is very large, it does not necessarily affect the US auto industry. “Because China exports relatively low-end products such as fasteners and tires, the maintenance market is mostly entered, while the US-based companies manufacture high-tech components to provide support for the original factory. It should be said that China’s exports of auto parts to the United States are a useful complement to the US auto industry.†Zhao Ying said, “China’s exports of parts to the United States and even Japan are the inevitable result of the international development of the auto industry and the choice of the market. The relevant sanctions in the automobile and parts industry violate the law of the market.†Jia Xinguang: The opportunity to take advantage of the “three lows†pattern to the “high quality, high value-added†development with the ten years after the accession to the WTO At the end, countervailing has become a new and important means for countries to trade frictions with China. As far as the United States is concerned, since the launch of the first countervailing investigation against China in 2006, so far, 10 countervailing investigations have been launched against China. This year, the United States passed a bill that explicitly authorized the US Department of Commerce to apply countervailing measures to non-market economy countries. This means that Chinese companies are increasingly exposed to countervailing investigations. After China’s complaint, according to the provisions of the World Trade Organization, China and the United States will have 60 days of consultation time, and this dispute can be resolved through bilateral talks. However, if the entanglement cannot be resolved by then, China can solve the complaint through the WTO legal procedures. In the view of Jia Xinguang, chief analyst of China Automotive Industry Consulting and Development Corporation, regardless of the final result, this trade dispute actually warns the Chinese auto industry, especially the part of the export market, that it has to be re-planned and transformed. The key period of the road. For many years, most of China’s auto exports have targeted low-end markets. The low-end, low-margin, low-quality “three lows†pattern has determined that Chinese automakers’ voices in trade are not strong. The exporting countries have repeatedly proposed "double opposition" to create a lot of topics and opportunities. Jia Xinguang believes that in the future, China's auto industry enterprises should increase their efforts to improve their product quality, so that the next round of Chinese manufacturing "going out to sea" will be on the road of "high quality, high value-added"; in addition, China with certain strength Automobile companies can also take this opportunity to think about the strategy of setting up overseas factories. For example, in many overseas markets where human capital and resource allocation are suitable, local manufacturing bases will be built. After close to market demand, enterprises will be better equipped. Our own products will increase production efficiency; and these Chinese enterprises will bring jobs to the local area, which will also help to alleviate trade frictions and better seek mutual benefit and win-win between both parties in international trade.
Stop Valves are closed by screwing a rubber gasket down onto a seat in the middle of the valve. Pros only use small versions that act as shutoff valves for fixtures such as sinks and toilets and outdoor sillcocks. Flow is inefficient because of the circuitous route the fluid (water, in most cases) has to follow. It's important to orient the valve in the right direction with the arrow (cast into the side of the valve) aligned with flow direction. That way, water flows against the bottom of the rubber gasket. If the valve is put in backward, the flow will force the gasket away from the top of the valve.
Stop Valves, Shower Stop Valve, Water Stop Valves, Brass Stop Valve
ZHEJIANG KINGSIR VALVE CO., LTD. , https://www.kingsir-valve.com